» » Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond

Download Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond fb2

by Ullica Segerstrale

Ullica_Segerstrale Psychology English
  • ISBN: 0198505051
  • Category: Medical Books
  • Author: Ullica Segerstrale
  • Subcategory: Psychology
  • Other formats: docx rtf lrf doc
  • Language: English
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press; First Edition edition (May 25, 2000)
  • Pages: 504 pages
  • FB2 size: 1939 kb
  • EPUB size: 1360 kb
  • Rating: 4.3
  • Votes: 235
Download Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond fb2
Download FB2 Download EPUB

the science in its approaching the objective truth and new achievements, and negative values, which are obstructive to this process; 6/ in uniting the objectivity of science with progressive social movements.

the science in its approaching the objective truth and new achievements, and negative values, which are obstructive to this process; 6/ in uniting the objectivity of science with progressive social movements.

Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Give and Take is brimming with life-changing insights Materials for High Temperature Power Generation an. . Learn as if you were to live forever Give and Take is brimming with life-changing insights Materials for High Temperature Power Generation and Process Plant Applications. 59 MB·31,745 Downloads·New! and process plant applications presented at Materials Congress 98 Frontiers in Material Science and Technology. 53 MB·41,553 Downloads·New!

This book strives to set the record straight It follows the sociobiology controversy as it erupted at Harvard in 1975.

This book strives to set the record straight. It shows that the criticism has typically been unfair. Still, it cannot be dismissed as "purely politically motivated". It turnsout that the critics and the sociobiologists live in different worlds of taken-for-granted scientific and moral convictions. Defenders of the Truth provides a fascinating insight into the world of science. It follows the sociobiology controversy as it erupted at Harvard in 1975 until today, both in the US and the UK. But the story goes more deeply, for i.

How do scientists separate their politics from their work-or is such a distinction even possible? These questions frame the two levels of sociologist Ullica Segerstrale's analysis of the sociobiology controversy, Defenders of the Truth. Wilson's 1975 publication of Sociobiology to his 1998 release of Consilience, he has consistently been the often-unwilling center of the vitriolic debate over human nature and its scientific study.

Defenders of the Truth book. In Defenders of the Truth, Ullica Segerstrale takes a hard look at the sociobiology controversy, sorting through a hornet's nest of claims and counterclaims, moral con When Edward O. Wilson published Sociobiology, it generated a firestorm of criticism, mostly focused on the book's final chapter, in which Wilson applied lessons learned from animal behavior to human society.

Segerstrale, Ullica (2000). Related Items in Google Scholar.

Science; Sociobiology; Behavioral Genetics; Sociobiology; Collections. GenEthx: Genetics and Ethics Database. Показать полную информацию. Segerstrale, Ullica (2000).

Similar books and articles. Ullica Segerstrale, Nature's Oracle. The Life and Work of . David Castle - 2002 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 93:666-667. Hamilton (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), Viii + 441 P. Illus. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Art History, History of Science, and Visual ExperienceMartin Kemp. The Human Animal in Western Art and Science. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.

Defenders of the truth The battle for science in the sdciobiology debate and beyond ULLICA SEGERSTRALE Technische Universitat Darmstadt FACHBEREICH 10 - BIOLOGIE - Bi bIiot hek - OXPORJD U N I V E R S I T Y PRESS SchnittspahnstraBe 10 D-64287 Darmstadt In. Nr. Contents Preface page vii 1 The sociobiology debate as a battle for truth 1 Scientific and moral truth-together or apart?, The sociobiology debate as academic engineering 4 The sociobiology debate as opera 6 PART ONE What happened in the sociobiology debate?

New Biological Books. Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Sociobiology.

New Biological Books. Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Wilson et al. A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals. Gilbert et al. The Conceptual Ecology of the Human Microbiome. Morar et al. Invisible Designers: Brain Evolution Through the Lens of Parasite Manipulation. Polydactyly in Development, Inheritance, and Evolution.

Segerstråle U 2000 Defenders of the truth: The battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar. Wilson E O 1971The insect societies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Segerstråle U 2000 Defenders of the truth: The battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar. Wilson E O 1971The insect societies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar. Wilson E O 1975Sociobiology: The new synthesis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar. Wilson E O 1980 The Relation of Science to Theology;Zygon 15 425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar

When Edward O. Wilson published Sociobiology, it generated a firestorm of criticism, mostly focused on the book's final chapter, in which Wilson applied lessons learned from animal behavior to human society. In Defenders of the Truth, Ullica Segerstrale takes a hard look at the sociobiology controversy, sorting through a hornet's nest of claims and counterclaims, moral concerns, metaphysical beliefs, political convictions, strawmen, red herrings, and much juicy gossip. The result is a fascinating look at the world of modern science. Segerstrale has interviewed all the major participants, including such eminent scientists as Stephen Jay Gould, Richard C. Lewontin, Richard Dawkins, John Maynard Smith, Nobel Laureates Peter Medawar and Salvador Luria, and of course Edward Wilson. She reveals that most of the criticism of Wilson was unfair, but argues that it was not politically motivated. Instead, she sees the conflict over sociobiology as a drawn-out battle about the nature of "good science" and the social responsibility of the scientist. Behind the often nasty attacks were the very different approaches to science taken by naturalists (such as Wilson) and experimentalists (such as Lewontin), between the "planters" and the "weeders." The protagonists were all defenders of the truth, Segerstrale concludes, it was just that everyone's truth was different. Defenders of the Truth touches on grand themes such as the unity of knowledge, human nature, and free will and determinism, and it shows how the sociobiology controversy can shed light on the more recent debates over the Human Genome Project and The Bell Curve. It will appeal to all readers of Edward O. Wilson or Stephen Jay Gould and all those who enjoy a behind-the-scenes peek at modern science.
Reviews about Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond (7):
anneli
I purchased this book for a review presentation in my Evolution course. Segerstrale does an eloquent job of providing the different sides revolving around the Sociobiology debate without providing her own heavy biased opinion (which is very hard to find involving this issue it seems!). I felt her writing was very easy to follow and quite smooth. I love her style because it gets right to the point without fluffing up any of the background information. She spent a lot of her life finding the answers behind the debate, and it felt like I was taking a trip into her life's work when I read this compilation of "evidence" regarding the debate. Though this is a book on the lengthier side, I would highly suggest reading this if you are at all curious about the sociobiology debate and where you stand in it. Segerstrale does a great job of providing information for you to take your own stance, and I think that is absolutely crucial when trying to figure out your own opinion. Definitely would recommend this read!
Arabella V.
My mentor Bill Drury once said that "real scientific controversies never get resolved, the participants simply get old and die, and the rest of us wonder what the fuss was all about". This may be the case in the "sociobiology wars" certainly the tone of many reviewers here is that Segerstrale has written an epitaph for the debate, but one can't help wondering -especially given the increasingly shrill claims of the "evolutionary psychologists" if what we have in DEFENDERS OF TRUTH isn't more of a cautionary tale of the effects of hubris. In any case Segerstrale has done us all an enormous service with this highly readable look behind the scenes at one of the most violent arguments in biology in the 20th Century. Perhaps the most enjoyable aspect of the book is the personal glimpses that we get of the primary players, but Segerstrale doesn't scrimp on the science within the battle or the contexts within which it is played out. I have found a great deal of useful lecture material for a number of courses here and I also find the book a valuable debunker of many of the legends that have grown up over the years. I also find Segerstrale's discussion of the essential unity of Wilson's work quite compelling -the outer shell changes, the fundamental core hasn't. My only quibble would be in terms of the conclusion "It ain't over till it's over..."
Welen
This is a lovely book - for a certain type of person. First of all, you must care about the long-running nature/nurture controversy that swirled around the publication, in 1975, of E.O. Wilson's book Sociobiology. Also, ideally, you have long sympathized with Wilson as against his main critics, Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould. That is, you must have long felt that Wilson's assertions in that book and later ones about the heritability of cultural and mental traits in humans were reasonable-perhaps wrong in some details, but certainly interesting, and good starting points. Finally, you should find it intriguing that these three biologists were all at Harvard, and had offices in the same building.
I fit the bill. In 1979 I read Michael Ruse's book "Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?" (Sense, he concluded.) I had no sympathy for using Marxism to critique work in science or anyplace else, which is where Lewontin and (less-blatantly) Gould were coming from. Moreover, there was something so right about the idea that humans have predilections that work themselves out in culture, and so exciting about the prospects for this kind of self-knowledge, that I felt the critics of the sort of research that Wilson was proposing were spoilsports, indeed.
But the time was not right. The critics got the best of things early on, and the name "sociobiology" acquired such a stigma that those who wished to do research (and get funded) in genetic influences on the human mind were advised to tread lightly and call their work something else. But things changed. What emerged in the 1990's was something called "evolutionary psychology", a new name for bad old "sociobiology", now respectable and in tune with current public attitudes, which have made a massive shift to a gene-centered view of - well, of just about everything.
Have I just given away the game? Perhaps, but you will have to take my word for it that this book is fun to read - if you enjoy the thrust and parry of ideas and the clash of egos. And, of course, scientists' pettiness and careerism is more entertaining than their usual posturing on pedestals engraved with "The Noble Search for Truth".
In 1980 and 1981 a young (I assume) Ullica got interviews with the main protagonists in the debates - Wilson, Lewontin, Levins, and others in America, plus various of the British contingent as well, such as Dawkins and Maynard Smith. Her area of study was the sociology of science, and she did some shaking and baking early on, using her material for contingent articles. But she kept a weather eye on how things were going in what was really a clash that exposed cultural fault lines in evolutionary biologists who were, fundamentally, on the same side. (Creationists they were not. Some of them might want to refine Darwin, but certainly none of them wanted to reject him!)
Now is a good time to sum up the course this debate has taken over the last quarter-century. The original political rationale seems quaint, and the focus has shifted to concern about how genetics and environment interact - it being more or less agreed that both are crucial. (Thus, an Hegelian synthesis of the dialectical process!) If you wish to know the history and drama of issues such as genes vs. environment, kin selection, group selection, the place of moral responsibility in a world of genetic "determinism", then this is the place to come. These and other issues are explored in a quietly comprehensive way. The personalities also come out, and the whole has the feel of a story, which of course it is, to its main players. And to you, too, if you take it up.

Related to Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond fb2 books: