» » Lessons from the Living Cell: The Limits of Reductionism

Download Lessons from the Living Cell: The Limits of Reductionism fb2

by Stephen Rothman

Stephen_Rothman Biological_Sciences English
  • ISBN: 0071378200
  • Category: Math & Science
  • Author: Stephen Rothman
  • Subcategory: Biological Sciences
  • Other formats: docx mbr doc txt
  • Language: English
  • Publisher: McGraw-Hill; 1st edition (September 18, 2001)
  • Pages: 272 pages
  • FB2 size: 1159 kb
  • EPUB size: 1932 kb
  • Rating: 4.2
  • Votes: 816
Download Lessons from the Living Cell: The Limits of Reductionism fb2
Download FB2 Download EPUB

Experimental biologist Stephen Rothman explains that reductionism also has serious, even dangerous, limitations.

Experimental biologist Stephen Rothman explains that reductionism also has serious, even dangerous, limitations. With the help of fascinating case studies, he takes a clear-eyed look at the social climate in which science is practiced and explores the collective psychology that he fears is leading scientists down a blind alley. Rothman explains why, despite all the hype surrounding the Genome Project, science is still no closer to building a bridge between molecules and reactions at the genetic level and large-scale biological processes

Biologist Stephen Rothman asks the big questions in pursuit of a relatively small answer i. .

Biologist Stephen Rothman asks the big questions in pursuit of a relatively small answer i.Release Date:September 2001.

Book Publishing WeChat. Lessons Madagascar Can Learn from Israel’s Water Policy. Rothman, S. (2002) Lessons from the Living Cell: The Limits of Reductionism. McGraw-Hill, New York. has been cited by the following article: TITLE: Cyberspace Security Using Adversarial Learning and Conformal Prediction. AUTHORS: Harry Wechsler. 410094 3 761 Downloads 5 556 Views Citations.

Stephen Rothman is a cell biologist who has been dedicated to understanding how cells function since the early 1960s. The story of his rude awakening is told in Lessons from the Living Cell. Young scientists are encouraged to believe that experimental evidence always comes first in scientific judgements; that the evidence is scrutinised for consistency with any current working hypothesis, which is abandoned and replaced by another if serious anomalies are repeatedly observed. Science is also portrayed as being free of irrational dogma. Rothman found that this is not the case.

We’re dedicated to reader privacy so we never track you. We never accept ads.

Stephen Rothman is an Emeritus Professor of Physiology at the University of California, San Francisco. He has written three books devoted to the topic of limitations of the reductionist scientific enterprise in biology. Life Beyond Molecules and Genes: How our Adaptations Make us Alive (2009), was about reductionism as a means of explaining life, of determining whether something is living.

that ultimately a complete understanding of a biological system, or even an organism, can be built from the.

In Lessons from the Living Cell, veteran experimental biologist Stephen Rothman argues that reductionism is a philosophical spectrum that tends to lead its practioners along a logical path to its extreme conclusion, what he calls strong microreductionism.

This book gets into both the philosophy of science-especially on the issue of reductionism-and also some issues in cell biology which have implications for those more general philosophical questions. The first part of the book focuses on reductionism and the author returns to that topic briefly near the end of the book. However, more than two-thirds of the book explores a major dispute in the science of cell biology, about just how proteins are transported within cells, and how they are secreted by cells

Rothman S. S. Sagiv . Ward J. (2006) Cross modal interactions: Lessons from synesthesia.

Rothman S. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar. Rothman S. Isenman L. D. (1974) The secretion of digestive enzyme derived from two parallel intracellular pools. American Journal of Physiology 226: 1082–1087Google Scholar. Schleghecken . Klapp S. Maylor A. (2009) Either or neither, but not both: Locating the effects of masked primes.

In this book, experimental biologist Stephen Rothman asserts that such a way of understanding will never be possible, and that hope that it will be is misplaced. No current Talk conversations about this book.

An elegant call to a new biology that goes beyond reductionism The Human Genome Project is the culmination of a two-centuries-old scientific tradition that takes as its central tenet the principle of reductionism, or the belief that a system can be thoroughly understood when it is reduced to its most fundamental constituent parts. Experimental biologist Stephen Rothman explains that reductionism also has serious, even dangerous, limitations.With the help of fascinating case studies, he takes a clear-eyed look at the social climate in which science is practiced and explores the collective psychology that he fears is leading scientists down a blind alley. Rothman explains why, despite all the hype surrounding the Genome Project, science is still no closer to building a bridge between molecules and reactions at the genetic level and large-scale biological processes. And, ultimately, he makes an eloquent and impassioned argument for a Darwinian-inspired approach to biological research that goes beyond reductionism to embrace living systems in their entirety.
Reviews about Lessons from the Living Cell: The Limits of Reductionism (2):
Adaly
Stephen Rothman has produced a book severely lacking amongst today's criticisms of the reductionist program, which, unfortunately now almost defines science itself.
In other words the understanding that all phenomena can be reduced to their constituent parts and thus constructed as a whole from those parts. This implies that given the parts, and only the parts, the whole can be assembled without any need for access to the true whole to check whether this makes sense. In biology this typically means deconstructing an organism into its recognisable parts and rebuilding it in this way. This leads inevitably to the local view now used in modern medicine and thus to various problems with the associated medicines produced in this way. The unwillingness of most scientists to even consider the possibility that other methods exist or that other methods can be constructed without this part-wholes strategy means any other medical treatments exist on the fringe without proper investigation.
What do I mean by the first statement ? I mean that many books exist which propagate a given idea or concept but few exist which investigate in a detailed way a given theory such as the vesicle theory and analyse its shortcomings and its evidence in a thorough way. About the only other text I know of which does this, to some degree at least, is the one by Michel Schiff on "The Memory of Water" where again a scientist battles against the deeply entrenched reductionist paradigm.
Rothman, in the first six chapters, discusses the concepts and the basics surrounding the reductionist metaphysics (it is a metaphysic since it is based on an obvious metaphysical belief: that parts are only constructed from below i.e the parts upwards) as well as what the main aim of biology is: to understand what life is. He includes a section on the various ways scientists implicitly rely on the reductionist idea, he has a wonderful discussion between two scientists who argue the basis of life from both a reductionist and a non-reductionist viewpoint. Most of the second half of the book is a very detailed analysis of the evidence for two separate theories in biology: the first, on the contraction of muscle tissue and, the second, on the transport and secretion of proteins within the cell. Rothman finds quite succinctly that life cannot be explained in the reductionistic sense, meaning that an anlysis of the parts cannot ever lead to the whole without the whole being an aspect of the study itself. In fact it is the whole which defines the parts and the parts cannot exist in and of themselves without the whole.
Rothman presents the first of these arguments (muscle contraction) very well and details the failure of the reductionistic paradigm, however this is done in hindsight since this has been confirmed; the second argument is still on-going and as such his arguments are no doubt contentious and will remain so for some time to come. Nonetheless he analyses the evidence in great detail and presents very strong arguments in favour of his own research which attempts to study this process as part of a whole. Rothman also accounts for the longevity of dsicredited theories through the artificial support of them through authority and an attempt to revamp defunct theories through slight of hand by forcing the contradictory evidence to support the old theory.
A book worth reading for both a criticism of the reductionist paradigm and the failure of the scientific community to go beyond typical human weaknesses such as egotism. A must read for every practising scientist.
SadLendy
Stephen Rothman has written a very important book in "Lessons from the Living Cell." In it he details criticisms of ultra-reductionism that have been mentioned by many others, notably Ernst Mayr in the "The Growth of Biological Thought." Rothman's book should be read by every practicing scientist and interested layman.
It is not that reductionism is a bad idea, but that it, like some other good ideas, has been pushed beyond its explanatory capability to what Rothman calls microreductionism. This is an argument with a long history, but like nature-nurture it seems never to be settled in some peoples' minds. While the nature-nurture argument has been demonstrated (to my mind at least) to be pretty much a non-argument (a few ultra-determinists not withstanding) the argument with microreductionism (which is to some extent related to the fight over nature-nurture) is still somewhat in flux. Reductionism in its best sense has been very productive, giving us drugs to fight diseases for example, and numerous other important insights about the structure and function of nature. However, Rothman has now demonstrated that some biological problems are non-reducible and thus reductionism is limited in its ability to explain. This is not because of some mystical property of cells (everybody pretty much dismisses the idea of a mystical vital principle that animates living things), but simply because of the necessary structure associated with biological function. In some ways the living cell has transcended the idea of a whole being a sum of its parts simply because of the complexity of cellular structure and function. Thus if you pounded a granite rock to dust you could reconstruct the rock if you had enough pressure and heat, but once a cell is broken open (as Rothman points out) its contents cannot be reconstructed in any way known to modern science.
Perhaps it is time for biologists to admit the truth that at least some physicists (notably Stephen Hawking) have come to- the universe is not totally explainable by a few basic principles. It is, indeed, a complex structure that can only be partially understood by any method, including religious "truth." The basic complexity of nature has always been suspected by most field biologists and we are not surprised to see microreductionism come into question. Perhaps what we all need- biologist, chemist, mathematician, cleric, philosopher, or whatever- is a less arrogant attitude toward the wonderful universe in which we live. This sense of wonder and humility is what lies at the heart of the best of all disciplines. I believe Haldane once said the if the human mind was simple enough for man to totally understand it, man would be too simple to understand it. This can be applied to the universe as a whole and life in particular. This is not an excuse to avoid trying to understand- only a warning that complete understanding may be made impossible by the nature of things. In the end at some basic level we are haunted by the ghosts of Gödel and Heisenberg chanting to us that some things may be unknowable. We had best heed their warning. Rothman's book provides a good basic foundation in this area for biologists.

Related to Lessons from the Living Cell: The Limits of Reductionism fb2 books: